Der Beweisinhalt wird in englischer Sprache gepflegt.

Bottom line

A frequently marketed growth-hormone-axis combination, pairing a substance sold as a GHRH analog with the ghrelin-receptor agonist ipamorelin. Human pharmacology has been reported separately for CJC-1295 DAC and ipamorelin, but no published human of this specific combination was identified. The mechanistic rationale (different receptors converging on growth-hormone secretion) is stronger than the direct combination evidence.

No established or recommended human dose.

Name and formulation variability

Market observation (source/date)Identity wordingClaimed components and amountsVerification limits
Online-market label observed in 2026“CJC-1295 (no DAC)”No-DAC substance plus ipamorelin; amount variableThe wording does not identify the DAC conjugate studied by Teichman et al.; seller identity and amount are not independent verification

Also known as: 2X Blend, Mod GRF 1-29 + Ipamorelin, CJC-1295/Ipamorelin stack.

Critical ambiguity: the clinical-study name CJC-1295 refers to a GHRH analog conjugated to a drug-affinity complex (DAC) designed for albumin binding. Online sellers also use “CJC-1295 no DAC” for Modified GRF 1-29, a different, non-DAC substance. Evidence for the DAC conjugate must not be transferred to the no-DAC product, and a product bearing only “CJC-1295” is not adequately identified.

Identity fork before evidence transfer
CJC-1295 identity must fork before blend evidence is consideredThe CJC-1295 label forks to the clinical-studied DAC conjugate and a Modified GRF 1-29 no-DAC market label. The identities are not interchangeable; only no-DAC and ipamorelin are market-associated with the blend.LABEL: CJC-1295WITH DACclinical-studied conjugateNO DACModified GRF 1-29 market labelNOT INTERCHANGEABLEIPAMORELINMARKETED BLENDWITH-DACseparate clinical evidenceNO-DACevidence gapIPAMORELINseparate human evidenceNO PUBLISHED HUMAN COMBINATION STUDYIDENTITYHYPOTHESIZED / SHARED DOMAINMARKET ASSOCIATIONEVIDENCE GAP
The DAC conjugate and the no-DAC market label have separate identity and evidence paths. Legend: solid outlines identify the substances described on the page; dashed lines show hypothesized or shared biological domains; dotted lines show market association only; barred lines mark missing combination or compatibility evidence.
Textalternative

The label CJC-1295 can point to the clinical-studied DAC conjugate or to a no-DAC Modified GRF 1-29 market label. They are not interchangeable. Listings associate the no-DAC label with ipamorelin, but no published human combination study was identified.

Component evidence

ComponentSeparate evidenceCombination evidenceCompatibility
CJC-1295 with DACHuman pharmacology: two randomized controlled ascending-exposure studies measured GH and IGF-1; no therapeutic endpoint. An unpublished phase 2 program was terminated after a death following acute myocardial infarction; causality was not established.Not identified; shared gap caption belowNo published combination stability study
Substance marketed as “CJC-1295 no DAC”Exact-material evidence: no controlled human study identified. DAC findings do not establish this substance's effects.Not identified; shared gap caption belowNot identified
IpamorelinHuman pharmacology: a small healthy-volunteer PK/PD study. Human efficacy: a randomized phase 2 postoperative-ileus study whose key and secondary efficacy analyses were not statistically significant.Not identified; shared gap caption belowNot identified

Shared combination-evidence caption: no published human study of the marketed pairing was identified.

Separate component study detail

Teichman 2006 reported one CJC-1295 DAC exposure of 30–250 mcg/kg or two to three exposures of 20–60 mcg/kg at weekly or two-week intervals. GH and IGF-1 increased, estimated was 5.8–8.1 days, and mean IGF-I—not GH—remained above baseline through day 28 in the repeat-exposure study; no therapeutic endpoint was tested.

Gobburu 1999 studied five ascending 15-minute IV-infusion cohorts of eight healthy men each (n=40; 4.21–140.45 nmol/kg). Terminal half-life was approximately two hours and GH peaked at approximately 0.67 hours. The randomized phase 2 postoperative-ileus trial enrolled 117 bowel-resection patients, with 114 in the safety/modified intention-to-treat population, and evaluated 0.03 mg/kg twice daily through postoperative day 7 or discharge. The key and secondary efficacy analyses were not statistically significant. These are descriptive study records, not guidance.

Human physiology support: Arvat et al. (2001) studied seven healthy men aged 24–32 years and reported synergistic GH release after native ghrelin and GHRH were each given IV at 1 mcg/kg. That study (PMID 11238504) supports a receptor-level hypothesis only; it did not study CJC-1295, Modified GRF 1-29, ipamorelin, or their combination. Raun et al. evaluated ipamorelin in rat pituitary cultures, anaesthetised rats, and conscious swine; that work supports secretagogue selectivity, not human efficacy or this combination.

Combination-specific studies

A targeted PubMed search through 2026-08-06 identified no published human or animal study testing the CJC-1295 (no DAC) + ipamorelin combination as a specific pair.

Safety and interaction uncertainties

  • FDA's December 2024 CJC-1295 briefing summarized anecdotal reports from an unpublished phase 2 HIV-lipodystrophy trial: two hours after an eleventh weekly CJC-1295 DAC dose, one participant had an ECG-confirmed acute myocardial infarction and died about an hour later. The attending physician attributed the event to previously asymptomatic coronary artery disease with plaque rupture; the trial was terminated, but the available record does not establish drug causality.

  • In the published 2014 proof-of-concept phase 2 postoperative-ileus study, two ipamorelin-treated participants had fatal serious adverse events after bowel resection for colon cancer. FDA's 2024 review states that both developed postoperative anastomotic leaks and that it is unclear whether the deaths were related to ipamorelin.

  • These were two separate PCAC reviews. In October 2024, committee members voted 0 yes, 12 no, and 1 abstention on placing each of ipamorelin free base and ipamorelin acetate on the Bulks List, citing insufficient safety and efficacy information. In December 2024, the committee voted against placing the five reviewed CJC-1295-related substances on that list (0–1 yes and 12–13 no, depending on the form). PCAC recommendations are advisory and are not FDA approvals or blanket statutory bans.

  • No published long-term safety study of the combination was identified; the cited ipamorelin human studies used a single infusion or treatment through postoperative day 7.

  • Theoretical mitogenic concern from sustained GH/IGF-1 elevation

Regulatory and product-quality notes

  • Neither component is FDA-approved. “Research use only” is an online seller's label, not authorization for human use.

  • CJC-1295 development (ConjuChem) discontinued 2006

  • Ipamorelin development (Helsinn/Novo Nordisk) discontinued

  • The 2026 List explicitly names CJC-1295 among GHRH analogues and ipamorelin among growth-hormone secretagogues and their mimetics in section S2.2.4; both are prohibited at all times

Evidence gaps

  • No combination in humans

  • No long-term safety data for the combination

  • No controlled human study of the substance marketed as “CJC-1295 no DAC” was identified

  • No dose-ratio optimisation study

  • Population and indication coverage remain limited: the CJC-1295 pharmacology trials included women and men, whereas the cited ipamorelin PK/PD cohorts included only healthy men and the phase 2 trial involved bowel-resection patients

Related identity comparisons: CJC-1295 + GHRP-2 and CJC-1295 + GHRP-6. The WADA and sport page keeps sport status separate from medicine approval and evidence.

Sources

  1. Teichman SL, et al. Prolonged stimulation of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I secretion by CJC-1295, a long-acting analog of growth hormone-releasing hormone, in healthy adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(3):799-805. PMID 16352683. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16352683/

  2. FDA. Briefing Document: CJC-1295-Related Bulk Drug Substances, Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee, December 4, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/media/183819/download

  3. FDA. Final Summary Minutes of the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee Meeting, December 4, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/media/185642/download

  4. Gobburu JVS, et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of ipamorelin, a growth hormone releasing peptide, in human volunteers. Pharm Res. 1999;16(9):1412-1416. PMID 10496658. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10496658/

  5. Beck DE, Sweeney WB, McCarter MD; Ipamorelin 201 Study Group. Prospective, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept study of the ghrelin mimetic ipamorelin for the management of postoperative ileus in bowel resection patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29(12):1527-1534. PMID 25331030. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25331030/

  6. FDA. Briefing Document: Ipamorelin-Related Bulk Drug Substances, Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee, October 29, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/media/182088/download

  7. FDA. Final Summary Minutes of the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee Meeting, October 29, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/media/185412/download

  8. Arvat E, et al. Endocrine activities of ghrelin, a natural growth hormone secretagogue, in humans: comparison and interactions with hexarelin and GH-releasing hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(3):1169-1174. PMID 11238504. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11238504/

  9. Raun K, et al. Ipamorelin, the first selective growth hormone secretagogue. Eur J Endocrinol. 1998;139(5):552-561. PMID 9849822. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9849822/

  10. World Anti-Doping Agency. 2026 Prohibited List, section S2.2.4. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/2025-09/2026list_en_final_clean_september_2025.pdf

Expertenstimmen

Was Experten sagen

Kommentare sind Meinungen und nicht Teil der Evidenzprüfung; eine Aufnahme bedeutet keine Befürwortung.

Für diese Verbindung wurde kein verifizierter Expertenkommentar in den Quellen gefunden, die dieser Atlas akzeptiert — peer-reviewte Literatur, Mitteilungen von Universitäten, Krankenhäusern und medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, Behörden sowie wissenschaftlicher Journalismus mit namentlicher Autorenschaft.

Das Fehlen von Kommentaren ist kein Beleg für oder gegen die Verbindung.

Aussagen von Anbietern, Kliniken und aus sozialen Medien sind grundsätzlich ausgeschlossen und werden nicht als Kommentare gezählt.

Für diese Verbindung wurden keine verifizierten Expertenvideos in den Quellen dieses Atlasses gefunden.

Das Fehlen von Videokommentaren ist kein Beleg für oder gegen die Verbindung.

Videos von Anbietern und aus sozialen Medien sind grundsätzlich ausgeschlossen und werden nicht gezählt.

Fragen

What does the marketed CJC-1295 plus Ipamorelin blend contain?

Listings commonly pair ipamorelin with a substance labeled CJC-1295 no DAC, often meaning Modified GRF 1-29. That is not the DAC conjugate used in the key CJC-1295 clinical research.

Has CJC-1295 no DAC plus ipamorelin been studied as a combination?

No published human randomized trial or controlled animal study of the specific marketed pair was identified. A native ghrelin and GHRH study supports only a receptor-level hypothesis and did not test these substances.

What safety uncertainties apply to CJC-1295 plus ipamorelin?

No combination-specific long-term safety evidence was identified. Separate development records include serious events whose causal relationship was not established, and those records cannot determine the safety of the marketed pair.

Why does the DAC distinction matter before reading this blend's evidence?

The DAC conjugate and the no-DAC market substance are different chemical identities. Evidence from the clinical-studied DAC material therefore cannot be assigned to Modified GRF 1-29 or the marketed pair.

Did the cited ipamorelin trial establish clinical benefit?

No. The randomized postoperative-ileus study reported that its key and secondary efficacy analyses were not statistically significant, and its specific population and design do not support a broader blend claim.

Is receptor-level plausibility evidence for the marketed combination?

No. It supports a biological hypothesis only; it does not establish combined efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, or compatibility for the exact marketed substances.